by atbattersea » Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:01 am
daddydaycarerocks wrote:Well done Wandsworth for keeping the cost cutting going. This is why we have the lowest council tax in the country, whilst also having a very well run council - something Lambeth could do well from learning from.
While I think that local authorities appear to be amongst the most inefficient organisations on the planet, what Wandsworth Council seems to specialise in is a gradual reduction in services (and/or contracting-out services) and accountability, rather than efficiency. Try getting them to actually do anything!
Anyway, back to the subject in hand: 3,500 people being dismissed and re-engaged… can anyone say TUPE?
[quote="daddydaycarerocks"]Well done Wandsworth for keeping the cost cutting going. This is why we have the lowest council tax in the country, whilst also having a very well run council - something Lambeth could do well from learning from.[/quote]
While I think that local authorities appear to be amongst the most inefficient organisations on the planet, what Wandsworth Council seems to specialise in is a gradual reduction in services (and/or contracting-out services) and accountability, rather than efficiency. Try getting them to actually do anything!
Anyway, back to the subject in hand: 3,500 people being dismissed and re-engaged… can anyone say TUPE?