Dear Ippyevie,
Apologies if we were verbally aggravating but if you read the post properly you will find actuallyadad was not just asking a fair question. This are some of his also aggravating comments:
"I imagine it can't hurt to make a donation, it's all a game of making friends with the vicar/governors etc."
"By the way I think all religious state schools should be abolished."
When I suggested he converted, like you are considering, his answer was:
"Obviously you could just lie and pretend to be a particular religion and show up at church/temple/synagogue every Sunday, but you shouldn't have to. That sounds like the approach @Chutneymanic suggests which seems to make light of the religions faith people want to protect."
At the beginning he said: "Let's not stifle people posting things which are bit thought provoking by making those kind of accusations, or else this site becomes very dull. (Remember this isn't a religious site - free thinking is allowed!)"
But when I gave him a bit of my free thinking:
"Ok Chutneymaniac this has gone a bit weird and personal. I'm not engaging in a public debate with a stranger about my personal religious views."
Regarding his fair and valid question he said things like:
"It's unfair because state resources, paid for by all, are not available to all." "Why should such a small minority get exclusive resources, facilities and opportunities funded by the state when there is such pressure on school places? Do Catholics pay more tax?"
Which are simply not true and I think we have left clear now.
And of course after all this he had the cheek of saying: "this may be an emotive topic, but no need to be rude. People may have different views to you but please try and keep it civil" when Scottov asked livegreen "to stick to facts and evidence next time". She may have been a bit harsh but we do get a lot of biased statistics. Plus I think we all have been harsh at time, maybe by trying to stop the blog becoming dull
Again, my apologies and all the best