by aryastark » Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:12 am
Human psychology is a fascinating thing. Now i am somehow mean, evil, and borderline insane.
As one poster said, i would never have forgiven myself if i read that a baby was stolen from that car, or car with baby was driven off by a thief. i would have been desperate with guilt, knowing that i could have saved that baby and had not.
it's also interesting to note that at no time did police on the phone suggest that i was wasting their time or taxpayers' money (to which i contribute very much indeed). i trust that police are well trained to tell off those who are wasting their time.
i am a mother of 3, and i know the difference between necessity and negligence. there was a situation when i was walking with my pram and saw an open car with two young children in it. i waited for a minute or two and mother arrived with two more children. noone at risk, no drama, no calls to police (residential side street and not northcote road, engine not on, and i could just about see a door open a few houses down). i simply performed a mental risk assessment and considered that what i saw (and continued to observe for 9 minutes) was out of the ordinary and dangerous for baby.
there were several ways how the mother of child in question could have made the situation infinitely safer. she could have parked in line of sight of the house she so desperately needed to go into; she could have left front door open, and she could have turned engine off (at least deterring those who might be after a car rather than a baby).
i am sure i'll get another load of wrath from some readers, but i am curious if anyone would leave their mobile phone, in everyone's view, on a side of northcote road, unlocked, and bugger off for some urgent business. i understand very well that there are a lot more of those who might steal a phone than those would steal a car or worse still a baby, but my point it - it's all a luck of the draw whether such person happens to be walking by in that place at that time, and most of us try not to tempt fate by putting ourselves or our possessions (or children) at risk.
skiing trip is a parental choice. neglect to ensure baby's safety is not a choice parents should have. and contrary to what someone had said - it was not the case of two babies / two very young children - it was a baby and a 10-yo.
but then again, those who accused me of being mean and otherwise with issues are least likely to not mis-interpret this post.
i take my comfort from the fact that police took this seriously.
[size=100][font=Calibri,sans-serif]Human psychology is a fascinating thing. Now i am somehow mean, evil, and borderline insane.
As one poster said, i would never have forgiven myself if i read that a baby was stolen from that car, or car with baby was driven off by a thief. i would have been desperate with guilt, knowing that i could have saved that baby and had not.
it's also interesting to note that at no time did police on the phone suggest that i was wasting their time or taxpayers' money (to which i contribute very much indeed). i trust that police are well trained to tell off those who are wasting their time.
i am a mother of 3, and i know the difference between necessity and negligence. there was a situation when i was walking with my pram and saw an open car with two young children in it. i waited for a minute or two and mother arrived with two more children. noone at risk, no drama, no calls to police (residential side street and not northcote road, engine not on, and i could just about see a door open a few houses down). i simply performed a mental risk assessment and considered that what i saw (and continued to observe for 9 minutes) was out of the ordinary and dangerous for baby.
there were several ways how the mother of child in question could have made the situation infinitely safer. she could have parked in line of sight of the house she so desperately needed to go into; she could have left front door open, and she could have turned engine off (at least deterring those who might be after a car rather than a baby).
i am sure i'll get another load of wrath from some readers, but i am curious if anyone would leave their mobile phone, in everyone's view, on a side of northcote road, unlocked, and bugger off for some urgent business. i understand very well that there are a lot more of those who might steal a phone than those would steal a car or worse still a baby, but my point it - it's all a luck of the draw whether such person happens to be walking by in that place at that time, and most of us try not to tempt fate by putting ourselves or our possessions (or children) at risk.
skiing trip is a parental choice. neglect to ensure baby's safety is not a choice parents should have. and contrary to what someone had said - it was not the case of two babies / two very young children - it was a baby and a 10-yo.
but then again, those who accused me of being mean and otherwise with issues are least likely to not mis-interpret this post.
i take my comfort from the fact that police took this seriously. [/font][/size]