Hi,
I manage a medium-sized team (10 people) and one of our team moved to another part of the UK during the pandemic - approx
4 hours' drive to the office. Since early 2023, our team works two days a week in the office, 3 days WFH.
She did this for the best part of a year although worked remotely for 3 months of this due to her mother being "very seriously ill". Her parents live near her. After 3 months, I had to meet with her on Teams to advise her that she needed to come back on site. She did this for a few months but then fell pregnant in March and due in December. Never heard another word about the mother who seems to have made a miraculous recovery.
She claimed early on that she was too ill to travel the 4 hours to work (hyperemesis) but that she was able to continue WFH with the odd break here and there.
In consultation with HR, initially she was told if she's too sick to travel, she's too sick to work. She sent in a threatening and very nasty Solicitor's letter. HR eventually relented. Fine.
Here's the issue:
I have several people on the team who are angry that she hasn't been on site for so long. They all have to travel decent distances (the nature of working in London) and feel she's taking the p*ss. They feel it's one rule for her and a different for everyone else - they don't know about the letter and the threats.
Anyway, I'm thinking ahead to the inevitable 'return to work' after 6 months. I think the next thing will be that she's breastfeeding and can't leave the baby. I foresee another threatening Solictor's letter. We provide a room on site for nursing mothers and we also have an onsite creche (she's already hinted at "struggling" to find childcare as she lives rurally).
Do we have a leg to stand on in insisting she returns to the office once mat leave is up?