by GES77 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:43 pm
Talk about knickers in a twist...
Personally, I think all the alleged bitchiness, smugness, spitefulness and snobbery has come from the posters who seem to be 'defending the OP'. The few of us who have "dared" to mention the rather significant issue of value (and, as Lalatrice said) market forces and economics are the ones who have been subject to harsh words.
Of course there is nothing wrong with advertising a houseswap - no one said there was, did they???? Its a great idea. However, there is a fundamental flaw in the ad: she is not asking for a like-for-like swap as highlighted in the car analogy. For those of you so "offended" by the mention of a range rover, I'd like to swap my £10 note for a £5 note isn't a very realistic or appealing swap either. I stand by my point with no bitchiness, smugness, spitefulness, snobbery intended. Just fact - Lavender Hill and BTC have differently valued property.
Talk about knickers in a twist...
Personally, I think all the alleged bitchiness, smugness, spitefulness and snobbery has come from the posters who seem to be 'defending the OP'. The few of us who have "dared" to mention the rather significant issue of value (and, as Lalatrice said) market forces and economics are the ones who have been subject to harsh words.
Of course there is nothing wrong with advertising a houseswap - no one said there was, did they???? Its a great idea. However, there is a fundamental flaw in the ad: she is not asking for a like-for-like swap as highlighted in the car analogy. For those of you so "offended" by the mention of a range rover, I'd like to swap my £10 note for a £5 note isn't a very realistic or appealing swap either. I stand by my point with no bitchiness, smugness, spitefulness, snobbery intended. Just fact - Lavender Hill and BTC have differently valued property.