by MGMidget » Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:51 pm
There is no set rule that a live in nanny must earn £350 a week. Indeed if the position is somewhere between au pair and nanny then its plausible the pay is somewhere between. All nannies need to start somewhere and why would you pay the same rate for an inexperienced nanny as you would for an experienced one?
I noted on another thread that it was mentioned that Norland probationers were available from the Norland nanny college's own agency for just over £17k a year (live in) and that would be someone who has completed the extensive Norland nanny training and done a work placement. So if that is a benchmark, then £215 (as mentioned in the original post) a week live-in for someone relatively inexperienced sounds plausible. Whether that person would be suitable to be left alone for long periods with a baby is another matter and a decision for the employer!
There is no set rule that a live in nanny must earn £350 a week. Indeed if the position is somewhere between au pair and nanny then its plausible the pay is somewhere between. All nannies need to start somewhere and why would you pay the same rate for an inexperienced nanny as you would for an experienced one?
I noted on another thread that it was mentioned that Norland probationers were available from the Norland nanny college's own agency for just over £17k a year (live in) and that would be someone who has completed the extensive Norland nanny training and done a work placement. So if that is a benchmark, then £215 (as mentioned in the original post) a week live-in for someone relatively inexperienced sounds plausible. Whether that person would be suitable to be left alone for long periods with a baby is another matter and a decision for the employer!