Wheresmyschool? wrote:Have to say I don't normally wade in on the side of the establishment but calling an institution which stopped the spread of Nazi Germany, helped rescue France from occupation and has helped bring democracy to the Eastern Bloc hugely flawed is a bit much.
Wheresmyschool: I'm glad that you enjoy my posts.
(1) Today's British army is not the army of World War II. That was a conscription army - completely representative of the male population. The British army now is a rather small 80,000 and not particularly representative of the population. I don't think anyone would claim that today's NHS is the same as the NHS when it was set up in 1948, so I don't see why the same should be said of the army.
(2) I am at a bit of a loss as to how the British army helped bring democracy to the Eastern Bloc. Yes, the soldiers sat on the Rhine for many many years. However, my recollection is it was popular protests let/orchestrated by a lot of brave dissidents that brought democracy to the Eastern Bloc.
To be clear, I have nothing against individual soldiers in the British army. I know several current and former serving members. However, there is a culture in much of the British army that has allowed abuses by soldiers to be carried out with impunity. There is a very high rate of crime by, and imprisonment of, ex-soldiers. Several times higher than the general population of males in the relevant age group. People who go around describing the army as heroes etc. contribute to this.