Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

88 posts
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:01 pm

Have readers seen the new open letter to political leaders and media on the possibel Bolingbroke school?

this is the text in circulation:

Open letter to: Michael Gove MP, Andy Burnham MP, Sadiq Khan MP, Jane Ellison MP, Lucy Heller (ARK), Cllr Edward Lister, Cllr Maurice Heaster, Cllr Kathy Tracey, Cllr Andy Gibbons, Cllr Tony Belton, Cllr Leonie Cooper

We are a group of Wandsworth residents, many of us parents of young children, who are concerned about the proposal for a free school on the site of the former Bolingbroke Hospital in Northcote ward, Wandsworth.

We agree that there is likely to be a need for extra school places in the Borough over the coming years. However, we are concerned that the current proposals from the ARK Bolingbroke Academy will not provide these places in a way that provides equal access to improved educational opportunities for all sections of the local community and that they will do very little to address the achievement gap that exists for children from underprivileged backgrounds.

What we would like you to do:

We understand that the parents involved in the campaign are trying to do what they believe is best for their children and they, of course, have as much right to educational opportunities as any other members of our community. However, in a time of constrained resources, we feel strongly that any additional funding allocated to new/existing schools should be targeted where it is needed most. As a result, we are writing to ask you to support us in calling for:

1) Wandsworth Council to carry out a review, before any funds are committed to particular free school proposals, on how secondary school place needs should be addressed over the coming years in a way that drives equal educational opportunities for all the children of Wandsworth.

2) ARK Bolingbroke Academy team to carry out and publish analysis on alternatives which could ensure that any new school provides choice for a wider group of children including:

- Carrying out cost/benefit analysis on alternative sites that would enable a larger school to be provided (e.g., as part of the Springfield Hospital development) that would be a more efficient use of resources and would serve a wider group of children
- Assessing alternative admissions policies including the effects on key indicators of social inclusion covering a) distance based admissions; b) the current feeder school policy; c) a modified feeder school policy that includes a broader range of primary schools and d) a lottery system based on a 1.5 mile radius around the site.

3) DfE/Wandsworth Council/ARK (as appropriate) to carry out an Equality Impact Assessment to assess the likely impact of the proposals on local people in respect of disability, gender and racial equality and identify any changes that may be needed to ensure that no groups are disadvantaged as a result of the proposed school and its policies.

Why we believe this is necessary:

The key issues we would like to see addressed are 1) the lack of evidence that a school is needed in this location rather than others; 2) the small size and location of the proposed site and 3) the admissions policy which focuses on only 4 primary schools (out of some 40 that are within a 1.5 mile radius of the proposed site); excludes Falconbrook, the most deprived primary school in Wandsworth and is expected a lead to a school that is significantly less socially and ethnically diverse than other nearby secondary schools.

1) Evidence that a school is needed in this location: The parent campaign claim that they struggle to gain access to local schools on distance grounds but this is not backed up by the facts. Students living near the Bolingbroke site could potentially gain access to at least 4 schools within 2 miles who are often offering places to pupils living considerably further away. For example, last year Chestnut Grove (which is a mile from Bolingbroke) was able to offer places to children living more than 2 miles away and Burntwood School (which is 1.7 miles from Bolingbroke) was able to offer places to girls living more than 3 miles away. In practice, only 27% of secondary aged children from Northcote ward currently attend Wandsworth state schools so many children from this area choose to travel several miles rather than attend local schools. We respect the right of all parents to to choose whichever school they prefer for their children. However, we believe it should be made very clear that this is not a case where there is no good, local school - there are several within walking distance where these children could gain places.

2) Size and location of the proposed school: The proposed site will only have space for a 4FE school and is situated in an extremely affluent part of Wandsworth with a feeder school policy which will ensure that it draws from a small and, on average, unusually affluent, less diverse pool of potential pupils. We have seen no evidence that other sites have been considered which might provide a larger school with resulting economic efficiencies which would then also be open to a better cross section of our community and benefit more children overall.

3) Admissions: We have seen no evidence to demonstrate that the proposed admissions policy ensures fair access to those in the local area. We are especially concerned about the exclusion of Falconbrook (the most deprived primary school in Wandsworth) despite it being closer to the site than Wix. We also believe restricting the pool to 4 feeder schools is extremely limiting and prevents the free school from serving a reasonable cross section of the community, especially when you consider that there are some 40 primary schools within a 1.5 mile radius of the site.

As a result of all these concerns, we question whether allocating resources to create extra choice for parents in a very small and affluent area is the best way of enhancing educational opportunities and attainment amongst the majority within Wandsworth.

We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our proposals.
Best regards

Laura Brown, Stuart Furminger, James Thomas, Julia Thomas, Hannah Davies, Belinda Ellis, Annalie Wilson, Sylvester Laciok, Toby Brown and Jonni Brown
Reference Wandsworth address: 59 Rogers Road, London, SW17 0EB
Post Reply
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:08 pm

This story appears on front page of todays Daily Mirror
Post Reply
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:59 pm

this story and letter appears in London Evening standard this evening too. there are quotes from two labour councillors.
Post Reply
schoolgatesmum
Posts: 370
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby schoolgatesmum » Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:02 pm

@localunionmember - is your sole purpose in using this site to promote all of your anti Bolingbroke Academy propoganda? Why not set up a twitter - then people who want to follow you could?
Post Reply
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:10 am

schoolgatemum

From the tone of your post I think you would prefer if I did not take part in this discussion.

I will reply to the question as to why I post here.

I am a local union member.

Fellow members live across the borough and their kids have been impacted by political decisions. The decision in july to pull plug on £300m spend on Wandsworth school buildings was not expected and is not welcome. it did not feature in the general election campaign. Union members with kids who are catholics are now left with a total mess and it is unclear what will happen next. That is just one of the problems. Any settlement re Bolingbroke has to be part of sorting the problems in the aftermath of pulling the plug on the £300m spend. The £300m spend was not dreamed up. It is needed to bring our schools up to a proper standard.

Fellow members have kids at Falconbrook. If there is to be a new school in Wakehurst Road they feel they must have a choice to send their kids to it like people from Wix school. I agree with them. It is totaly out of order for a group not elected to say that Falconbrook kids are "naturally" part of the catchment area of battersea park school and there by be excluded from the new school.

You may consider both these points as propoganda. I think they are two substantive points. the school group can not determine the outcome of the first point but they can address the second.

The group who made the decision to exclude falconbrook kids should revisit this decision and reverse it.
Post Reply
https://www.batchandthyme.com
https://theexhibit.co.uk/
https://maroconstruction.co.uk/
https://www.thesmartclinics.co.uk/
https://www.thecrooshhub.com/
http://www.ameliesfollies.co.uk/
https://thebronteclinic.com/
https://campsuisseski.com/
https://theluxurytravelboutique.com/offers/
https://www.thedogfatheruk.com/
https://paintthetowngreen.biz
https://www.youbeyou.co.uk/
https://nappyvalleynet.com/wellbeing-guide
https://www.westminster-wealth.com/andrew-rankin-enquiries
http://www.ayrtonbespoke.com/
https://merrygoround.club/
https://cookingattheshed.co.uk/
foureyes
Posts: 21
Joined: Oct 2009
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby foureyes » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:05 pm

I think everyone has the right to post on this forum don't they? The pro-schoolers are certainly using it to its full advantage - why is that not propaganda?
Post Reply
doleofficedad
Posts: 52
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby doleofficedad » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:40 pm

LUM - you betray your complete ignorance of the £300 million BSF spend by saying it was required to bring the borough schools up to 'a proper standard'. It was not and you should do a bit more research on that whole BSF car crash to understand the underlying problems with BSF and why it was stopped. Furthermore, £70 million is going to be spent on two borough schools where very little additional pupil capacity is being added - the cost per pupil will be significantly less at the Bolingbroke school. It is better use of public money. Additionally it is highly likely that R&M works at other borough schools will also be completed once the recent Whitehall capex allocation has been looked at by the council. You never see the wider perspective on this debate but as has been said elsewhere on this site seek only to make political capital out of our childrens education.
Post Reply
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:36 pm

Regarding what sums are required to bring local schools up to standard i will be the first to admit that i am not aware of all the details.

I understand from talking to union members that professionals from construction professions, education professionals and construction companies and people from the town hall with a record of getting value for money had signed off a large scale package and were within days of entering into binding contracts when the plug was pulled on the funding.

I would welcome you setting out what these professionals and construction companies got so very wrong that the plug had to be pulled completely.

Was the price too high or did the work not need doing? From what i have been told the work did need doing and still does.

As I said i am not an expert onthis. i am told that there are problems in the aftermath of the plug being pulled especially for catholic parents.

I do not recall a promise to pull the plug on this spending featuring very prominently in the general election.

My general point is that Bolingbroke funding- if the site is acquired- has to be part of the overall mix to be fair to all parts of the borough.
Post Reply
AKA
Posts: 20
Joined: Sep 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby AKA » Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:01 pm

I have a son who is not yet school age so don't have any agenda regarding this issue but have read quite a lot about it on this forum. It seems a good idea to have a new school on the Bolingbroke site and all power to these parents that are trying to set up the school but shouldn't children from all of Wandsworth be able to apply like they can for all the other schools in Wandsworth. Seems a bit unfair that they will be restricting it to 'feeder' primaries. Please do correct me if I'm missing something here.
Post Reply
https://merrygoround.club/
https://cookingattheshed.co.uk/
https://maroconstruction.co.uk/
https://campsuisseski.com/
https://theexhibit.co.uk/
https://nappyvalleynet.com/wellbeing-guide
yummydaddy
Posts: 51
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby yummydaddy » Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:20 pm

In my opinion admission shall be like for most other schools in the borough (Battersea park school being an example): "applicants who live nearest to the school by the shortest walking route with street lighting as measured by the Council’s Geographical Information System"

Anything else is often a mess, contentious, and unfair.

Having feeder-areas, novel ways to define catchments areas, etc. just creates confusion - just look at the total mess the Belleville expansion is in.
Post Reply
schoolgatesmum
Posts: 370
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby schoolgatesmum » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:21 am

As far as I understand, anyone can apply for the school. There will be no selection (unlike quite a few schools in the borough who do partial selection or banding). The admissions policy is for when a school is oversubscribed. There has to be an element of exclusion (whether by distance or banding or selection) in order to be able to prioritise. So the first level of prioritisation is whether the child attends one of the feeder schools. If there are places left after this then I think they are offered on a distance basis. I guess if the admissions were on distance alone, you'd end up with another Belleville situation where you have to live practically on the doorstep to get in. And we all know how much those houses cost!
Post Reply
localunionmember
Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2011
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby localunionmember » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:41 am

I notice that this school features today in the national media. There is a report in the Observer.

The council gives the reason for the exclusion of Faconbrook kids as the "lay of the land".

What does this mean?

The group claim that Falconbrook is a "natural" part of Battersea Park School.

Do the parents and kids on Winstanley get any say at all?

The reality is that there is no good reason to exclude Falconbrook while including Wix. If there was we would have been told by now.

The suggestion that this new school - to be funded by taxpayers to tune of £40 m by time it opens is doors - is open to all as in post above is disengenous.
Post Reply
LauraBrown
Posts: 136
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby LauraBrown » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:23 pm

Apologies, I hadn't seen this thread and copied bits of my letter into the other 'harangued outside the library' thread. On the feeder school point, clearly the school will be oversubscribed as it is only a 4 form entry (part of the reason why this doesn't seem an ideal location for it - Belleville expansion here anyone?). Therefore, places will be restricted to kids from those schools and the Falconbrook exclusion is clearly unfair. If nothing else, I hope ARK Bolingbroke Academy revisit this point and widen the policy to include this school as well.
Post Reply
https://theluxurytravelboutique.com/offers/
https://www.westminster-wealth.com/andrew-rankin-enquiries
https://www.thecrooshhub.com/
https://paintthetowngreen.biz
https://www.thesmartclinics.co.uk/
http://www.ameliesfollies.co.uk/
yummydaddy
Posts: 51
Joined: Dec 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby yummydaddy » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:11 pm

so on one hand you agree it will be oversubscribed on the other hand you want to include children further away (Falconbrook) ... ?? really contradictory, not ?

so what to you want ??

that's why you suggest Springfield as a site because it's closer to your own house ?
Let's just be all honest here ...
Post Reply
EHMorris
Posts: 135
Joined: Aug 2010
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Open letter on possible Bolingbroke school

Postby EHMorris » Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:57 am

I have followed the threads regarding the proposed new school with interest and I applaud those who are giving their time and effort to set up a new secondary school, it seems the extra places for the borough will be required.

However I like AKA am surprised there will be "feeder" schools. Is there a valid reason for there being specific feeder primary schools regardless of distance a prospective pupil lives from the proposed site or is it because the majority of parents supporting the new school have pupils at the proposed feeder schools? Incidentally I can understand if it is the latter however I am interested to know one way or the other!
Post Reply

Start a conversation
To create a new post and start a new conversation, please click on the button.