Oh, really. Dangerous dogs shouldn't be out in public. End of.DeborahB wrote: I am not justifying dangerous dogs being allowed to run riot off the lead but
Also, "viscous" - um. I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Mayamoo, good luck getting the council to listen. I really don't think dangerous dogs are taken seriously in this country. A few years ago I saw a mastiff cross ripping a border collie to bits. The dog turned on its owner and bit his arm numerous times. No charges were filed because both dogs were off leash (I spoke to the collie owner several weeks after the fact).
I've owned and fostered dogs, and used to compete in obedience with my own dog, so I'm certainly not anti-dog. I've seen a good share of responsible dog owners on Clapham Common but I've also experienced idiots letting their dog jump all over my (at the time) 1 year old daughter in her stroller without calling it off. Yes, I'm one of those mothers who teach their children NOT to pet any dog without asking the owner first. In that same vein, I expect dog owners to keep track of their animal at all times and put them on leash when necessary.
Also, I don't at *all* see the parallel between an out of control dog and an out of control toddler. One can disfigure/maim you. The other might... uh, what's the worst thing I can think of? Spill a sippy cup on you? Knock over your cake? Annoyances, yes, but if you're going to huff on for weeks about an 18 month old getting in your way on a scooter for 30 seconds then all I can say is #firstworldproblems.