Councillors approve the return of Formula E

23 posts
Wandsworth Council
Posts: 269
Joined: Oct 2012
Contact:
Share this post on:

Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby Wandsworth Council » Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:55 pm

Formula E racing is set to return to Battersea Park after councillors on Tuesday night voted in favour of the event being staged again next year and the year after.

Councillors on the community services scrutiny committee voted in favour of its return after hearing that June’s weekend of racing had been a success with more than 55,000 people attending – including around 9,000 Wandsworth residents.

Seven thousand borough residents purchased tickets to the event while another 2,000 free tickets were given to local schools, amenity groups and residents associations in the area around Battersea Park. This means that in total more than 16 per cent of those who attended lived in the borough.

Giving the event the green light for two more years also guarantees that Battersea Park will benefit from a total extra investment of £600,000 – a sum that could rise to £1m if the races are permitted for another two years beyond 2017.

Additional revenue will also be generated for the public purse from the event which will help fund important local frontline services and at the same time play a role in keeping Wandsworth’s council tax bills as low as possible.

Councillors heard that although this year’s inaugural races had been very well organised, important lessons had been learned which will be put into practice over the next two summers to ensure that disruption to people’s normal enjoyment of the park is kept to the absolute minimum.

This will involve more strictly controlled segregation of park users from vehicles involved in the circuit set-up and removal and the potential introduction of rolling temporary closures around the park’s perimeter road during these build phases.

The delivery of Formula E infrastructure materials is also set to be reviewed and streamlined to ensure a reduced impact on the park during the build process.

Noise levels are also likely to be reduced for future races. The organisers of Formula E have pledged to significantly increase the number of free audio earphones given to spectators so the race commentary does not need to be relayed through a public address system that can be heard in nearby homes.

The organisers will also explore alternatives to using helicopters to deliver aerial shots of the race. Some residents complained about excessive helicopter noise on the first day of racing and although this was drastically reduced on day two, it did cause annoyance to local residents and attempts will be made to remedy this.

Councillors were also told that marshalling will be improved for next year – especially during the build and de-rig phases and that better signage will also be put in place so that park visitors are fully aware that, as was the case this year, most of the park’s 205 acres remain open for their use and enjoyment right up to the race weekend.

The committee heard that the park remained almost fully open to the public apart from only four days in June - the weekend of racing and a two day intensive race infrastructure de-rig immediately afterwards.

During this four day period, however, joggers, strollers and dog walkers and other members of the public were still able to enjoy the park’s picturesque riverside walk and a section of green open space near the Millennium Arena athletics track which were kept open throughout.

The committee also heard that there was no long-term damage to the park, apart from very some minor cosmetic works which have either been carried out already by Formula E or are being put right. A small number of trees had suffered one or two very small broken branches but none had suffered any long-term ill-effects.

And apart from the resurfacing of the badly rutted and potholed car parks and former boules area, which was also funded by Formula E, there had been virtually no new hardstanding added to the park to allow the races to take place.

A post event review conducted by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) had concluded that none of the park’s important historical features had suffered any damage or harm.

Community services spokesman Cllr Jonathan Cook said: “I fully welcome and applaud this decision. It is the right decision for Battersea Park and also for the wider general population of Wandsworth.

“Granting permission for Formula E to return for the next two years means we have secured a total of £600,000 of new funding for a whole range of improvements in the park itself, and there are also additional sums we will receive that will be used to help fund frontline council services for our vulnerable residents and which can also help keep our council tax bills as low as possible – something of huge importance to those in our community who are on low or fixed incomes.

“Despite the grim warnings that came from some opponents beforehand, the simple truth is that the event did not cause the mayhem and destruction they predicted. There was some disruption of course, but this only really affected the perimeter road, and once beyond that there were literally hundreds of untouched acres of beautiful green open space for people to enjoy as they would at any other time of the year.

“We are confident that the important lessons we learned from this year’s inaugural set of races will mean that any disruption caused in the build up to next year’s races can be kept to the absolute bare minimum.”

Staging the races in the park puts Battersea at the heart of this new global sport and is expected to provide a great boost to London’s tourism trade.

Formula E racing cars use cutting edge electric motors that produce virtually no noise and no harmful emissions. They are powered by batteries that are charged up using a sea algae that produces water not exhaust fumes from technology invented by a south London firm. The advanced type of electric motors used in their racing cars are likely to be fitted as standard in the next generation of electrically powered family saloons and hatchbacks.

The council also wants to support the British motor racing industry which generates thousands of jobs in the UK’s engineering sector. Earlier this year trade and investment minister Lord Maude said: “Formula E has vital implications far beyond the motorsport industry. It is a locus of R&D around electric cars; offers an important opportunity to promote and generate interest around these cars; and promotes clean energy and sustainability.”

He highlighted the fact that 500 London buses are being fitted with an energy recovery system conceived by Williams Formula One and manufactured by UK engineering company GKN. This enables buses to improve their fuel economy and lower their CO2 emissions by over 20 per cent, reducing their impact on air quality in the capital.

Last year the HLF published a landmark report – ‘The State of UK Public Parks 2014: Renaissance to risk?’ (http://www.hlf.org.uk/state-uk-public-parks) which urged local authorities to devise new ways of securing funding to pay for the upkeep of parks and green spaces. It warned that “unless future funding is generated in new ways, parks are at serious risk of rapid decline and even being sold off and lost to the public forever”. (http://www.hlf.org.uk/about-us/media-ce ... der-threat)
Post Reply
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Sun Nov 29, 2015 3:11 am

What complete BS!? Read between the lines: we messed this up big time, we really will try harder next time, but we're not going to tell you how!

This blather is also full of outright lies and misleading statements:
Formula E racing cars use cutting edge electric motors that produce virtually no noise and no harmful emissions. They are powered by batteries that are charged up using a sea algae that produces water not exhaust fumes from technology invented by a south London firm.
This is a complete lie: at the 2015 event in Battersea Park the cars were charged from the national grid. Formula-E are also boasting about how much louder (and thus "exciting") the cars will be next year.

The link made between Formula-E and the Williams energy recovery system is also completely spurious: Williams is a Formula 1 team, this technology was being developed by F1 teams long in advance of Formula-E (legal in F1 since 2009) - McLaren had a system fitted in a car in 1997.

I could go through this point by point to show the inaccuracies, but it would be several times longer than the original post.

As to the money they are claiming to put into the park - they cannot even sort the drainage system out, I've been complaining about it for more than a year. And c'mon people, you know that what Formula-E puts in Wandsworth Council will take out in other ways - ie the budget for the park won't be raised.
Post Reply
LP73
Posts: 511
Joined: Aug 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby LP73 » Sun Nov 29, 2015 6:30 am

Fabulous! It was such a brilliant event last year, very well organised and a great day out.
We are looking forward to attending next year.
Post Reply
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:24 am

LP73 wrote:Fabulous! It was such a brilliant event last year, very well organised and a great day out.
We are looking forward to attending next year.
You must have extremely low expectations in your life.
Post Reply
LP73
Posts: 511
Joined: Aug 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby LP73 » Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:39 am

We were there for two days with a large group of people on both days. Ages from 6 months - 70 and all had a fantastic time.
We have very high expectations although this was a first event so we didn't expect it to be as well organised of fun. There was something for everyone.

Did you attend? Or are you having a moan without full knowledge?
Post Reply
https://merrygoround.club/
https://www.capitalgardens.co.uk/store-locations/neals-nurseries-garden-centre/
https://www.batchandthyme.com
https://www.thecrooshhub.com/
http://www.ayrtonbespoke.com/
https://thebronteclinic.com/
https://cookingattheshed.co.uk/
https://www.youbeyou.co.uk/
https://theluxurytravelboutique.com/offers/
http://www.ameliesfollies.co.uk/
https://www.westminster-wealth.com/andrew-rankin-enquiries
https://nappyvalleynet.com/wellbeing-guide
https://www.thedogfatheruk.com/
https://theexhibit.co.uk/
https://campsuisseski.com/
https://www.thesmartclinics.co.uk/
https://maroconstruction.co.uk/
https://paintthetowngreen.biz
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Sun Nov 29, 2015 4:57 pm

LP73 wrote:Did you attend? Or are you having a moan without full knowledge?
Yes I did attend. The "racing" was awful, just a procession, and you could see hardly any distance. There were a few side shows of interest - but I'm pretty certain I would not pay for tickets in the future.

The lack of knowledge is on your part - being there for two days of event is fantastic, you missed the extended setting-up and take-down that disrupted the use of the park and prevented proper access for three weeks. That's estimated to have displaced approximately 200,000 visitors (there was nothing special about 50,000 visitors over a Summer weekend, that's the normal rate).

Read Councillor Cooke's disingenuous comment:
There was some disruption of course, but this only really affected the perimeter road, and once beyond that there were literally hundreds of untouched acres of beautiful green open space for people to enjoy as they would at any other time of the year.
Hmm, so the only affect was on the perimeter road - so if you couldn't get beyond the perimeter, because there were 10ft high steel and concrete barriers, you were effectively blocked from access to the park.

Engage some critical faculties on this issue, read between the lines of this nonsense from the Council: they admit there were health and safety beaches, they admit that visitors to the park were put in harm's way, they admit that the public were blocked from accessing the park because of the barriers/lack of signage/lack of crossing points and they happily say (in their report on the issue) that they turned the entire park over to Formula-E to do with as they pleased.

What they still have not done is apologised to local residents for this, nor explicitly laid out how they are going to remedy this situation. Thus there is a air of distrust, because those opposing the event (actually, really opposing the disruption in the park) don't believe that the Council will be able to manage the construction period any better than they did last time (and they are still pretty much laying all the blame for this at Formula-E's door - they do not recognise that it is their responsibility).

Read the views of a local councillor on the health and safety obfuscation:

http://jamescousins.com/2015/11/how-saf ... rsea-park/

Then, ask yourself an easy question: does your enjoyment of that weekend justify displacing other visitors from a local park over an extended period? Particularly when the event could have been held at a dedicated racing track and displaced no one.
Post Reply
LP73
Posts: 511
Joined: Aug 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby LP73 » Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:10 pm

I am a local resident and I still used the park. I will not comment further as I can only go from my experience which was wonderful :-)
Post Reply
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:01 pm

LP73 wrote:I am a local resident and I still used the park. I will not comment further as I can only go from my experience which was wonderful :-)
I think that is fair enough - but take a look at the experience of others:

http://savebatterseapark.com

When I first heard that Formula-E was going to be in the park I was indifferent about it. Then I heard they were closing the park for four days and I was a bit more concerned. Finally I had the experience of walking through the building site that the park had become and navigating the various obstructions that hindered progress through the park - that obviously was not right, and that's why I have opposed any further events.

I've just heard that there seems to be enough fuss made on this issue that the Council has decided that it is not enough for the scrutiny and oversight committee to decide on the future of Formula-E - they are going to have a full council debate on it.

I don't expect they will change their minds (because there is a fairly large Conservative majority) - unless Formula-E have decided that they would rather go elsewhere, and this is the Council's way of covering their bums ("oh look, we really did listen after all").
Post Reply
kearly
Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2015
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby kearly » Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:12 pm

Wandsworth Council is posting this to every community forum it can find. Having followed this closely from the first concrete block and HGV that entered Battersea Park, surprising everyone as the 1800 letter the Council sent out had mysteriously disappeared (along with the risk assessment apparently), I can confidently say that this report is full of fiction. The cars are not quiet and Formula E is boasting this year about the new noise of the cars which you can find on YouTube. It glosses over the fact that the supporters of the Pagoda were absolutely horrified by the treatment of this extremely important site, with Agag and his cars using it as a plinth to promote themselves. Then there's no mention that the zoo had to take emergency measures and close at the height of summer and move some sensitive species. But more to the point, it fails to adequately express how much danger Formula E and the Council put the general public in.

The disruption was not worth the paltry sum Wandsworth Council is putting back in to the park, nor the terrible precedent they are setting by selling the entire park to an external company at the peak of summer and the implications this will have for all other London parks. Over three weeks Formula E and Wandsworth exposed the public to significant daily danger as they turned Battersea Park in to a construction site and allowed children and the public to mix with heavy goods vehicles, forklift trucks and tons of concrete being shifted about. It's a huge surprise no one was seriously injured. Added to this the fact that to set it up required the creation of 8500 tons of new concrete blocks, 7585m of new metal barriers, 800 HGVs to deliver these, removal of mature trees to give the cars room and tarmacing over grass to create pit lanes etc. This was an insult to the senses, a revolting blow to the tranquility of what should be a haven of peace. 200 people protested outside the Scrutiny & Oversight Committee meeting last week at Wandsworth Town Hall, backed by Wandsworth Labour and the Green Party and an independent councillor. The Council's own survey showed 62% are against the event and 2700+ signatures were put forward. And yet the Council ignored all this and voted in favour of keeping it. Shame on them.
Post Reply
https://merrygoround.club/
https://www.capitalgardens.co.uk/store-locations/neals-nurseries-garden-centre/
https://nappyvalleynet.com/wellbeing-guide
https://cookingattheshed.co.uk/
https://theexhibit.co.uk/
https://campsuisseski.com/
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:35 pm

mungomuffit wrote:abattersea - can you please stop quoting back…
Not really, that's what the quote button is for, so that responses can be contextualised. I would understand your complaint if I were quoting the entire lengthy post that someone else had made, but I'm not doing that, I'm just responding to particular points. I don't know what posts might appear between the post I would be responding to and my post itself.

That's essentially how chat rooms/bulletin boards work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forum
Post Reply
Abbevillemumof3
Posts: 32
Joined: Mar 2015
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby Abbevillemumof3 » Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:33 pm

Clapham Common gets partially closed for weeks over the summer do all sorts of festivals etc. It's a good revenue earner for them and a percentage of the money gets reinvested back into the Common. The councils are having their budgets slashed so they are having to find revenue streams. Someone has to pay for the upkeep or improvements.

Stop being a nimby (not in my backyard), stop moaning. You just have to suck it up sometimes. Visit a different park for a change over that w/e.

And yes, my family attended. My 8 year old thought it was amazing.
Post Reply
this_is_cat
Posts: 290
Joined: Jan 2015
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby this_is_cat » Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:35 pm

Happy with this decision by WBC despite the frankly crazy objectors and their hysterical hyperbole. (One reason cited for not hosting it again was that local estate agents didn't report an increase in business over the weekend! Clutching at straws?!)

I live within sight of the park, walk my dog there twice a day and cycle through it twice a day also. The disruption was minimal and proportionate to the scale of the event.
Friends that attended with us enjoyed it (except for the rain on the Sunday but even atbattersea can't blame the organisers for that!)
Other friends watched it on TV and expressed interest in coming to see it next year, so I'm glad we will be able to host them next year, and also that the borough will benefit from the money.
Post Reply
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:09 am

Abbevillemumof3 wrote:Clapham Common gets partially closed for weeks over the summer do all sorts of festivals etc.
While Clapham Common is about the same size as Battersea Park the significant difference is that events on Clapham Common take up a small part of the common. When Formula-E was in Battersea Park - as Councillor Cooke notes - most of the work was on the perimeter road, this blocked access to around 95% of the park for around three weeks.

Imagine the events on Clapham Common fencing off all access from the major roads around it - that's how the park was. Of course, feel free to lobby Formula-E to hold its next event on Clapham Common (hopefully though Lambeth Council wouldn't act as rashly as Wandsworth)
Stop being a nimby (not in my backyard), stop moaning. You just have to suck it up sometimes. Visit a different park for a change over that w/e.
I am proud to be called a nimby on this issue - it is a local issue, and clearly only local people are affected. I hardly expect support from people that never visit the park. But we don't just want it taken somewhere else for others to suffer - we think it needs an appropriate venue. There are dozens of suitable racing tracks in the UK, there are probably other commercial venues that would love it too (ExCel, Wembley and the Olympic Park have been mentioned).

Your statement here clearly shows that you are completely missing the point. We are not campaigning about the closure of the park for a weekend, we are campaigning about the closure of the park for four days (probably excluding around 100,000 visitors), the health and safety issues and the blocking of access to the park over a three week period (which probably excluded another 100,000 visitors). Many people also had leisure and sports events cancelled in order to accommodate this event (in one case I know of where a children's event was cancelled at short notice by the organisers because of the health and safety and access issues).
And yes, my family attended. My 8 year old thought it was amazing.
The race, or the associated events? My seven year old was bored of the race after two laps. I've heard stories of motorsport fans going home and watching it on TV because the sight lines were so poor.

I don't doubt that some, many, or even most of the people visiting the park that weekend enjoyed the associated events - but those events could have been run without the race, and thus without the three weeks of disruption and limited access that ensued.
Post Reply
https://www.thesmartclinics.co.uk/
https://www.westminster-wealth.com/andrew-rankin-enquiries
https://maroconstruction.co.uk/
https://theluxurytravelboutique.com/offers/
https://www.thecrooshhub.com/
https://paintthetowngreen.biz
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby atbattersea » Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:24 am

this_is_cat wrote:Happy with this decision by WBC despite the frankly crazy objectors and their hysterical hyperbole.
The health and safety, and lack of access issues are not hyperbole. Take a look at the web site:

http://savebatterseapark.com

I'd really like a reference for your claim about estate agents - where can I find that printed or online elsewhere?
I live within sight of the park, walk my dog there twice a day and cycle through it twice a day also. The disruption was minimal and proportionate to the scale of the event.
I've no idea what part you were cycling through, but Carriage Drive was closed to cyclists for a period approaching three weeks. As this is the only part of the park where cycling is legal (though of course many cycle elsewhere) I'm thinking you must have been sharing the paths with pedestrians. This mixed traffic (cyclists, pedestrians, runners, etc) on narrow paths (particularly around the Millennium Arena) is even acknowledged as a problem by Wandsworth Council in the report on the event.

In fact, all of the health and safety and access issues are acknowledged by the Council in the same report. That's not hyperbole, that's the pro-Formula-E whitewash.
Friends that attended with us enjoyed it (except for the rain on the Sunday but even atbattersea can't blame the organisers for that!)
Really happy to engage with you on the real issues, but even Ravi Govindia doesn't have control over the weather.
and also that the borough will benefit from the money.
What has been put to me (and I have no way of verifying or disproving this because Wandsworth Coucil will not publish the facts of the matter) is that the events already held in Battersea Park generate the entire parks budget for the whole borough. Isn't it enough that the parks are self-funding, without having to cross-subsidise other services?
Post Reply
papinian
Posts: 577
Joined: Feb 2012
Options:
Share this post on:

Re: Councillors approve the return of Formula E

Postby papinian » Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:32 am

mungomuffit wrote:Battersea Park is much bigger than Clapham Common, surely.
Battersea Park: 200 acres
http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/info/20052 ... ersea_park

Clapham Common: 220 acres
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clapham_Common
Post Reply

Start a conversation
To create a new post and start a new conversation, please click on the button.