3,500 council staff will be "dismissed and re-engaged"

4 posts
Annabel (admin)
Site Admin
Posts: 3912
Joined: May 2008
Contact:
Share this post on:

3,500 council staff will be "dismissed and re-engaged"

Postby Annabel (admin) » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:12 pm

From the Guardian

Image


More than 3,500 Wandsworth and Richmond council staff told they will be "dismissed and re-engaged" in shared staffing plans

http://www.wandsworthguardian.co.uk/new ... ing_plans/
Post Reply
Motherslittlehelper
Posts: 177
Joined: Nov 2013
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: 3,500 council staff will be "dismissed and re-engaged"

Postby Motherslittlehelper » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:11 am

Well done Wandsworth for keeping the cost cutting going. This is why we have the lowest council tax in the country, whilst also having a very well run council - something Lambeth could do well from learning from

Obviously councils are a taxpayer funded organisations and need to move with the digital times, something Wandsworth seems do well at. Maybe there will be future consolidation with other London boroughs that will save even more money for the tax payer.
Post Reply
Lucullus
Posts: 40
Joined: Feb 2013
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: 3,500 council staff will be "dismissed and re-engaged"

Postby Lucullus » Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:14 am

I'm sure the looming loss of one's job will do wonders for keeping council staff motivated and engaged in their roles!
Post Reply
atbattersea
Posts: 265
Joined: Oct 2014
Contact:
Share this post on:

Re: 3,500 council staff will be "dismissed and re-engaged"

Postby atbattersea » Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:01 am

daddydaycarerocks wrote:Well done Wandsworth for keeping the cost cutting going. This is why we have the lowest council tax in the country, whilst also having a very well run council - something Lambeth could do well from learning from.
While I think that local authorities appear to be amongst the most inefficient organisations on the planet, what Wandsworth Council seems to specialise in is a gradual reduction in services (and/or contracting-out services) and accountability, rather than efficiency. Try getting them to actually do anything!

Anyway, back to the subject in hand: 3,500 people being dismissed and re-engaged… can anyone say TUPE?
Post Reply

Start a conversation
To create a new post and start a new conversation, please click on the button.