Postby jasonz » Mon Sep 25, 2017 6:26 am
Having used Uber dozens of times, I find them more affordable, more convenient and intrinsically safer than black cabs.
After all, is there a centralised record on what driver picked you up, what their snail trail of GPS is across of London, and where they dropped you off with a black cab?
With all that recording, surely it is safer to get in a taxi which is fully GPS tracked, than a black cab which takes only cash in hand, with a driver you don't know the name of. Let alone the radio taxis.
A situation like John Worbys for instance of dozens of sexual offences against drunk women for instance would simply be a logistical impossibility with an Uber.
I know whom I'd prefer my children to travel with.
Even a single person going missing would result in an arrest.
I cannot see the TfL's case standing on merit, it's clearly a politicised decision, and the merits of their arguments look very flaky indeed.
As a matter of record, all the Uber drivers are vetted according to TfL standards - and Uber have passed numerous TfL audits over the last several years without any issues being raised.
It's hard to see under all these circumstances how this will fly in court.