Postby GuyD73 » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:51 am
As ever, there are some very considered, kind and helpful responses here. Thank you and I’ll respond in turn. SW12pops I appreciate your comment but it appears we are diametrically opposed as to our interpretation of what the vote represented. You call it ‘democracy’, I call it a criminally procured marginal result from a gerrymandered electorate, characterised by stolen facebook data, dark money and election fraud. We were told it didn’t matter that 16/17 year olds couldn’t vote because the ref was advisory. (Oh, and then all of a sudden it wasn’t – not OK). It was also dreadful not to allow Brits living overseas >15 years to vote on a matter of such importance. There are 11 ongoing criminal investigations into the conduct of both Leave.EU and Vote Leave campaigns. VL recently lost their appeal and Grimes has been found guilty and fined £20k by the electoral commission. This was to a criminal burden of proof. The whole axis of Banks and Farage is dodgy AF and I bet we see further revelations linked to the Mueller investigation in the US. Then you have the disgusting, dog-whistle-racist micro-targeted ads on Facebook, the abhorrent Breaking point poster and the lying on an unprecedented scale about more £ for the NHS (Farage withdrew that the next day!) and hordes of Turks coming here, when there was NEVER any prospect of Turkey joining the EU in our lifetimes. If, has been suggested in some quarters, Gove and Johnson were aware of the collusion between campaigns and therefore complicit in election fraud, and if they are found guilty as such by the National Crime agency, do we still respect the result? Or do we consider it illegitimate? Not a tricky one that. That was not democracy, it was an utter failure of democracy. I’m afraid you also attempt to use an analogy which isn’t equivalent in any sense. My choice to believe or not believe has no negative impact on my kids, their potential future partners or anyone else. A believer’s refusal to deal with a non-believer would indeed be intolerant (and vice versa) but this isn’t the same thing. In this instance, my in-laws vote directly removes the rights my kids have to live and work across a continent, it removes their rights as EU citizens. What a hideous thing to do to your grandchildren, it makes me feel physically sick.
Lalectrice, I really appreciate your contribution a great deal, thank you. I couldn’t agree more with your description ‘sinister, gut-wrenching and lamentable’. Your post also made me realise that I hadn’t given adequate thought to how the kids might be ‘conflicted’ and how I might mitigate that scenario. While I take on board the sentiment you express, and however this sorry mess plays out, there will come a reckoning where the children need to be told why the freedoms their parents enjoyed some of their adult lives do not apply to them, and one cannot pretend that it isn’t those who voted leave (and the cretins that lied to them) that precipitated the situation. My kids are 4 and a half and 6 and a half. I haven’t really even considered when might be an appropriate age to explain the full picture to them, but I expect they will be mature enough to understand it before they hit double digits. In any case, they are seasoned campaigners now, having been on every significant pro-EU march and demonstrated outside Parliament several times.
-
Attachments
-