Postby chelseadad » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:10 am
Mumptious
Thank you very much for your reply. I'm still a little fuzzy as, if I'm not mistaken, and I really could be, Wandsworth criteria favours siblings over locality? Hence the practice of parents moving into the catchment of a school long enough to get one child in, then moving wherever they want to because the siblings are guaranteed to enter too. But I am happy to leave the matter here, regardless.
In answer to your question, I have two small children, and we will be placing the oldest in to primary school in 2013. To be honest with you, I find the allocation of state school places on the grounds of religion (or ethnicity) to be deeply offensive. I cannot help but see it as discrimination on factors that are completely beyond the control of the child, and which is therefore unjust. Exacerbating this, Wandsworth, due to some quirk of history, has far too many religiously selective schools already (mainly Christian though, with I think, one Muslim-selecting school). Adding another, albeit currently unrepresented, religious school only makes matters worse for Wandsworth, as I think, we should be decreasing the number of religious-selective schools in the borough, not increasing them.
We are a multi-ethnic, multi-faith society. And I believe that our state schools should, indeed must, sbe resolutely secular, while allowing spaces for our children to congregate and practice any faith, along the lines of any group identity they want, while offering a study of religions and other groups that promotes tolerance and civic inclusivity. I am aware that I am in a minority (though one which is growing, I suspect). So, with that, I hope your school succeeds in educating its pupils to the highest of standards.
Regards
chelseadad