tooposhtopush wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:01 amSurely that can’t be right?
And in the very next line:
tooposhtopush wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:01 am
I mean I get it that if the OP was having loud parties or running a business from the garden then that would be grounds for action but grilling a steak three times a week would surely be hard to justify as an anti-social?
The first problem you have is that you negate your own argument. Surely you can do what you like, oh, no, course you can't.
The second problem you are having is that you are not putting yourself in the shoes of the person on the receiving end. If it was "just cooking a steak", then the OP would just cook it in their kitchen. In fact, what they are doing is lighting a fire in their back garden, and probably doing a pretty good job at producing as much smoke as possible.
Lighting the barbecue usually involves an accelerant, that has its own set of nuisance problems, and then a load of smoke, accompanied by the cooking odours. This is nothing like cooking in your own kitchen - for a start you'd run out of the house if you had that much smoke in it.
Rather than thinking about the freedom of the OP to do whatever they like, think about the poor complainant, who isn't able to "do whatever they like" - ie just have a nice quiet, smoke free life.
Thre are all kinds of parallels you would not stand: a neighbour with a continuously barking dog, a crowing rooster, a naked sunbather, Motorhead in the basement… the snorer, the enthusiastic sexual intercourse. There's another thread on this very site attempting to find out if the downstairs café has removed the soundproofing…
It is much easier to block out sound than it is to block out smells.
OP, you are the nuisance, think about how you remove the nuisance, not how you can continue doing what you are doing.