Postby wasateacher » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:27 am
I think that there is a problem with putting soldiers into heroic status. Soldiers are actually well remunerated for their services - far better than most public servants when housing allowances, etc are taken into account.
The other problem is that, let's face it, there are some who either join the army because they are thugs or become thugs after joining. Celebrating all forces gives a sense of justification and invulnerability to those.
When this subject come up, I think of Iraq. Firstly, it was largely our government which created the situation which led to the atrocities of Saddam Hussein. We conveniently turned a blind eye for our economic and political benefit. Then when we did go in, initially the British solders did well in making links with local communities, etc, in contrast to the high handed tactics of the USA army. However, did we complain when nearly all the contracts went to firms in the USA with a few crumbs to the UK? Did the army act swiftly and decisively when it became apparent that a small group of army personnel were committing torture. These are the ones who threatened the safety of everyone else. The army colluded with the bad behaviour until it was exposed in the media.
So, until the military cleans up its own act, I don't want to celebrate them.