Echoing the previous poster, this has nothing to do with Political leanings.
Greening’s PR was very good at convincing the locals of her good works and concerns, but like the rest she deliberately avoided taking on the obvious corruption in the planning department and street works. She was given all the evidence, but conveniently quashed it. Remember how Putney rallied against all the high rises on URR around 2014/5 and fought the school/apartments on LRR? Well, she was given the evidence on corrupt practices, but you never heard it from her right?
Fleur Anderson was also provided with it all around last local elections. To be fair to her, she was concerned until the Party Whip made it clear that their record in Brent, Lambeth and Southwark was not worth taking on the Tory party over!
So please everyone, know where the priorities of these candidates lie... not with you or Putney!
That said, Sweet is a particularly amoral type of chappy. As member and then Chair of the Plannibg committee, he was fully informed of the horrific tax and social crimes of some of the applications, yet he made the choice of furthering his own political career over destroying communities and reallocating resources from old people and low income housing, to overseas Billionaires without the requisite tax.
Editor:- we have spoken on this, and we know you’ll be contacted immediately to have this post removed. That is up to you, but we know you to have Wandsworth’s best interests first.
You have been talked through the evidence held, and you know it is extensive.
You just need them confirm that 3-5 Nightingale Lane is not a smoke and mirrors tax dodge to Saudi and Bahrain?
Ask them how the specialist Dementia facilities are getting on? Or the conditions of ownership? Better still, the important restrictions on transport for pollution control etc? Did Sweet procide over the committee that tried to stop this obvious corruption, or did he procide over the one who tried to have the whistleblowers arrested?
You will be aware of the pollution concerns and spats of deaths from concrete trucks? Well everything you see in this video, is illegal, against the Planning permission, is contrary to what the LONDON Plan dictated on the borough, yet Sweet procided time and time again to prevent any enforcement. Afterall, didn’t want to upset the boroughs favourite contractors and funders!
Btw! The cabin structure on the bus stop and pavement are also illegal, and have caused thousands per day to walk in street and stand in rain, all ok’ed by Sweet!
Hope this is reflected in the votes for him!