MrV wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:44 am
It’s about time too. I am a global HR director for a large multinational - and yes, we do analyse the screening questions and background of each candidate to decide who to progress. As a previous poster said, this is about levelling the playing field - something that should have been done decades ago.
Does is really mean a tougher time for little privately educated, bubble wrapped, exotic gap-yeared Freddie or Amelia? No, but it may seem like it as their comfortable world of calling in favours, trust funds and blatant sense of entitlement to walk into a high paying job after university comes crashing down. There’s no better life lesson, and it’s also a good sense of the obstacles that ‘disadvantaged’ kids have faced for years.
The private bubble is bursting, and for many of you, it has clearly swept the rug from underneath your feet.
It saddens me that we have such bitter and twisted individuals working for such multinational companies.
If I was to change the names in your second paragraph to Tinisha and Ahmed and talked about their upbringing and background I’m sure you would be first to shout the r word.
Many parents struggle to pay the fees forgoing the annual holidays and luxuries, others are there because their parents work abroad for the government, military etc. Not everyone privately educated has a trust fund and the great connections.
The mask is really starting to slip from these progressive types. They preach all the kind fluffy words but there is a sinister and evil marxist undertone in everything they do.