OK.Midwifemummy13 wrote:No it's a fact thank you & I'm in the enviroment daily so I know what I'm talking about. Thanks
i'll take to that to mean exactly what it looks like.Midwifemummy13 wrote:I've read previous posts you have put on here & your a very argumentative person! So I shall not get into it with you I'm afraid! Like I said I KNOW for a fact this happens!
Enjoy yr day Scotty
Yes, yes, yes! I so agree re boundaries. I just don't get why Wandsworth don't introduce this system. To me it would be the fairest way as it wouldn't discriminate against those who rare genuinely renting but it would mean people who rent short-term to get one child into school would have to move their child when they move out of area. This way the schools would be local schools and people who live a short distance wouldn't end up sending their child to a school miles away. Is this not common sense?SFMC wrote:Just a question - is it renters moving in to rent in the catchment or the sibling policy (for those that have moved out) that is the issue? or both? or ?
Also Earlsfield has a lot of great schools and many families here (I live in Earlsfield) also have issues getting their kids into Beatirx Potter, Allfarthing and Earlsfield Primary for example! Don't think many are renting the other side of the Common . Same issue in Balham with Ravenstone! It's all over this borough and apparently all over London!
Beatrix Potter, imho, has a much better system in terms of their catchment area and policy - much more clear cut and fair.
Too many kids and too few good schools....
In Canada where I am from there is a clear mapped boundary for each school - you know exactly which is your school and if you move your kids goes to school locally to where you live. You can apply of course to get into a non local /boundary school and they usually have a lottery system for oversubscribed schools where people apply out of the school boundary. Seems simpler and more clear cut.
Good luck - I understand your frustration (we almost bought between the Commons but decided against it because of the school issue).