by Alchemy » Wed May 31, 2017 12:02 pm
All the nurseries that I know of have always treated the government funding as a contribution to their cost, and charged a top-up.
The nursery that my youngest currently attends is a charity, and charges minimal top-ups (£30 per week). The new restriction on top-up fees is really hitting them hard, as they do not offer additional hours that they can charge parents for.
They have now consulted with parents whether we would be willing to make a weekly charitable donation, but of course this is not enforceable and therefore leaves them exposed to non-payment.
Basically, unless they can come up with a clever plan to charge parents without calling it a top-up fee they will be unable to continue offering good-value childcare of the kind the government is trying to encourage.
It seems a ridiculously short-sighted approach to me, and unless it is changed "free" childcare will not be available anymore. (Which may be the goal after all, as it will allow the government to claim that funding was available, but not used, so the scheme can be abolished.)
All the nurseries that I know of have always treated the government funding as a contribution to their cost, and charged a top-up.
The nursery that my youngest currently attends is a charity, and charges minimal top-ups (£30 per week). The new restriction on top-up fees is really hitting them hard, as they do not offer additional hours that they can charge parents for.
They have now consulted with parents whether we would be willing to make a weekly charitable donation, but of course this is not enforceable and therefore leaves them exposed to non-payment.
Basically, unless they can come up with a clever plan to charge parents without calling it a top-up fee they will be unable to continue offering good-value childcare of the kind the government is trying to encourage.
It seems a ridiculously short-sighted approach to me, and unless it is changed "free" childcare will not be available anymore. (Which may be the goal after all, as it will allow the government to claim that funding was available, but not used, so the scheme can be abolished.)