by Bringbackpacers22 » Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:08 pm
Hi, I don't live in the Nappy Valley area, but in the 'sunny??' south of England on the coast. However I'm guessing that the practices for having a baby whilst overweight don't vary that much. I was around 17 stone when I had my first daughter at the age of 35/36 and probably around 18 stone when I had my second at about 38. Luckily being overweight didn't appear to affect my fertility at all and I fell pregnant within a couple of months of trying for my first child and even quicker with my second. The midwives treated me fairly normally although they did express concerns about my age and weight, but there are a couple of things that I wish I had known beforehand. Firstly you can follow a sensible diet and try not to put on any extra weight during pregnancy and also during breastfeeding providing that your midwife/doctor has approved it. Both slimming world (which I can highly recommend having lost nearly 5 stone to date on myself,) and weight watchers will amend your food intake to allow for pregnancy and offer good advice and support. Secondly although both my pregnancies went relatively smoothly, every time I went to my midwife I measured over the average fundal measurement. I just presumed I was having a bigger baby as they do run in our family, which I was. But nobody told me that this could be down to gestational diabetes. I did take a test for gestational diabetes, but was told I was okay, although on the high side of normal. In the end with my first child, my waters broke just before terms, but despite being induced, baby was not forthcoming 3 days later, and they said she wasn't even coming down onto my cervix. I ended up having an emercency caesarean section and baby was 10 lb 9oz with low blood sugars (both signs I may have had have gestational diabetes after all.). She ended up in special care baby unit for a week and I feel this could have been avoided if I had eaten a lot less sugar during pregnancy. My second was also a caesarean, but booked not emergency and she was slightly lighter at 10 lb 1 oz and although she had slightly low blood sugars she was not nearly as ill as baby number 1 and stayed with me on the ward and was discharged after a couple of days. I had eaten a lot less sugars in the second pregnancy. So my advice would be to speak to the doctors/midwifes about your concerns and get good advice about diet, trying to put on no more than I stone during pregnancy if you still have weight to lose and only increasing calorie intake by the recommended amounts, (which if memory serves is only in the 3rd trimester anyway.) Hopefully this will avoid the issues I experienced as well as any issues that may arise from carrying around all the extra weight. Good luck.
Hi, I don't live in the Nappy Valley area, but in the 'sunny??' south of England on the coast. However I'm guessing that the practices for having a baby whilst overweight don't vary that much. I was around 17 stone when I had my first daughter at the age of 35/36 and probably around 18 stone when I had my second at about 38. Luckily being overweight didn't appear to affect my fertility at all and I fell pregnant within a couple of months of trying for my first child and even quicker with my second. The midwives treated me fairly normally although they did express concerns about my age and weight, but there are a couple of things that I wish I had known beforehand. Firstly you can follow a sensible diet and try not to put on any extra weight during pregnancy and also during breastfeeding providing that your midwife/doctor has approved it. Both slimming world (which I can highly recommend having lost nearly 5 stone to date on myself,) and weight watchers will amend your food intake to allow for pregnancy and offer good advice and support. Secondly although both my pregnancies went relatively smoothly, every time I went to my midwife I measured over the average fundal measurement. I just presumed I was having a bigger baby as they do run in our family, which I was. But nobody told me that this could be down to gestational diabetes. I did take a test for gestational diabetes, but was told I was okay, although on the high side of normal. In the end with my first child, my waters broke just before terms, but despite being induced, baby was not forthcoming 3 days later, and they said she wasn't even coming down onto my cervix. I ended up having an emercency caesarean section and baby was 10 lb 9oz with low blood sugars (both signs I may have had have gestational diabetes after all.). She ended up in special care baby unit for a week and I feel this could have been avoided if I had eaten a lot less sugar during pregnancy. My second was also a caesarean, but booked not emergency and she was slightly lighter at 10 lb 1 oz and although she had slightly low blood sugars she was not nearly as ill as baby number 1 and stayed with me on the ward and was discharged after a couple of days. I had eaten a lot less sugars in the second pregnancy. So my advice would be to speak to the doctors/midwifes about your concerns and get good advice about diet, trying to put on no more than I stone during pregnancy if you still have weight to lose and only increasing calorie intake by the recommended amounts, (which if memory serves is only in the 3rd trimester anyway.) Hopefully this will avoid the issues I experienced as well as any issues that may arise from carrying around all the extra weight. Good luck.