firsttimerSW11 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:02 pm
Academically 30% or their students do not meet expected standards vs 80% of Honeywell. Only 9% are achieving greater depth vs 23% or Honeywell kids.
Persistent absence At Shaftesbury is 28.4% vs 9.9% at Honeywell.
Lastly, 40% of children are eligible for free school meals at SP vs 9% at Honeywell.
Worth going to view for yourself. But usually schools are undersubscribed for a reason so I’d be asking those questions.
Schools are undersubscribed for thousands of reasons, and the sentence on FSM should precede the other. SP serves a much more socioeconomically diverse area; with lower income come a number of other issues that affect attendance and results.
If anything, at Honeywell there is a large fraction of families who can afford tutoring and many children are indeed tutored to enter selective secondary school, which obviously then improves their SATS scores.
The crude results should not be taken a reflection of the quality of the teaching and of the learning environment as there are so many other factors at play.